Assignment of benefits (AOB) was the mechanism that turned Florida's post-storm recovery process into a litigation machine. Between 2013 and 2022, AOB-driven lawsuits against Florida property insurers surged from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands annually -- not because storm damage increased, but because the legal structure of AOB combined with one-way attorney fees created a profit motive for inflated claims and litigation. Florida's SB 2A reform in 2023 changed the rules fundamentally. Property managers need to understand what changed, what is still permitted, and how to handle contractors who still use AOB tactics in the post-reform environment.
What Assignment of Benefits Is
An AOB is a legal document in which the policyholder -- the property owner or manager -- assigns the right to collect insurance claim benefits to a third party. In practice, this third party is almost always a contractor (roofing contractor, water restoration company, public adjuster). By signing the AOB, the policyholder transfers to the contractor the legal right to file and receive payment on the insurance claim for the covered work.
The appeal for contractors is straightforward: rather than completing work and then waiting for the policyholder to be paid by the insurer and then pay the contractor, the contractor takes over the claim and gets paid directly by the insurer. The policyholder, in theory, does not have to manage the claim -- the contractor handles it.
The Pre-2023 Abuse Pattern
The AOB abuse pattern that drove Florida's insurance crisis worked as follows: a contractor would approach a homeowner or property manager after storm damage, offer to handle the insurance claim for them, and present an AOB agreement as part of the service contract. The policyholder would sign, transferring claim rights to the contractor. The contractor would then file a claim with inflated scope and pricing. When the insurer disputed or denied the inflated claim, the contractor's attorney would file suit -- and under Florida's pre-reform one-way attorney fee statute, if the attorney prevailed, the insurer paid the attorney's fees. This created a financial structure where even small disputes became profitable to litigate, because the potential attorney fee award was often larger than the underlying claim amount.
The result: carrier exits, insolvent insurers, and premium increases that priced many Florida property owners out of the private market. Six major carriers became insolvent during or after Hurricane Ian (2022), in part because of AOB-driven litigation exposure that predated the storm.
What SB 2A Changed
Florida SB 2A (effective January 2023) made two fundamental changes to the AOB landscape:
Elimination of One-Way Attorney Fees
The one-way attorney fee provision that made AOB litigation so profitable was eliminated. Under the current law, each party in an insurance dispute generally pays its own attorney fees. This removed the primary financial incentive for inflated claims and litigation -- the expected attorney fee award that made small disputes worth filing suit over is no longer available.
Restriction of AOB Agreements
SB 2A also restricted AOB agreements themselves. For residential property insurance, AOB is now limited to emergency services -- specifically, up to $3,000 or 1% of Coverage A (the dwelling coverage limit), whichever is less. Beyond that cap, broad assignment of benefits rights is prohibited for residential property insurance.
Why Property Managers Should Still Be Cautious
The reform addressed the systemic abuse that drove mass AOB litigation. It did not eliminate all AOB-related risk for individual property managers.
Limited AOB Still Transfers Rights
Even the permitted limited AOB for emergency services transfers your claim rights for that scope to the contractor. The contractor then controls the emergency services claim filing, and their characterization of the emergency work becomes part of the claim record. If the emergency services claim is inflated or poorly documented, it affects your overall claim even though the litigation incentive is reduced.
Contractors Who Operated Under the Old Model Still Exist
The reform changed the law, not the contractors. Companies that built their business model on AOB-driven claim inflation are still operating in Florida -- many have adapted their approach in ways that comply with the letter of the new law while still creating the same dynamics. High-pressure requests to sign any document transferring claim rights, especially from contractors who show up unsolicited after a storm, warrant the same caution as before the reform.
Storm chasers -- contractors who canvas storm-affected areas soliciting work immediately after a weather event -- frequently present AOB documents as part of their initial paperwork. Do not sign any document that transfers your insurance claim rights to a contractor at the door, especially from a contractor who is not on your pre-approved vendor list and who you have not independently verified. The right to review, consult with your broker or attorney, and understand what you are signing before you sign it is always available. A legitimate contractor who does good work does not need your AOB to get paid.
Alternatives to AOB
Direct Payment to Contractors
The standard arrangement -- and the one most favorable to the property manager -- is for the insurer to pay the policyholder, and the policyholder to pay the contractor directly. This keeps the property manager in control of both the claim and the contractor relationship. The insurer's settlement is between the insurer and the policyholder; the contractor relationship is separate.
Managed Repair Programs
Some Florida insurers offer managed repair programs (MRP) in which the insurer coordinates repairs through a pre-vetted contractor network. The property manager still owns the property and the claim, but the insurer manages the contractor selection and oversight. MRPs can be an efficient option, particularly after large storms when independent contractor capacity is constrained, but they mean accepting the insurer's preferred contractors rather than your own vetted vendors.
The most effective protection against AOB pressure is having a pre-approved vendor list in place before a storm. When a contractor you vetted before the storm arrives to perform work you called them for, there is no vacuum for a storm-chasing AOB contractor to fill. Building and maintaining a pre-season vendor list -- with licensed, insured, known contractors in roofing, water restoration, electrical, and structural trades -- eliminates the moment-of-vulnerability that AOB solicitation exploits.
Track contractor relationships, vendor documents, and claim status in LossHQ
Manage your vendor list and claim documentation before storm season -- not in the moment a contractor shows up at the door.
Start Free -- No Card Required ->The Bottom Line
Florida's 2023 SB 2A reform eliminated the financial structure that made AOB-driven litigation so profitable -- one-way attorney fees are gone, and broad AOB for residential property is prohibited. The limited AOB that remains (emergency services up to $3,000 or 1% of Coverage A) still transfers claim rights, so caution is appropriate even within the permitted range. The best protection is a pre-season vendor list that eliminates the need to deal with unknown contractors after a storm, and a firm policy of not signing any document that transfers insurance claim rights without review and independent verification of the contractor. For related guidance, see Florida hurricane season contractor fraud, why Florida property insurance claims get denied, and Florida roof insurance claims in 2026.